The red marker on the map is the earthquake's epicenter, which originated in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in southeastern China, at a depth of 10 km, 22 km N-NW of Liuzhou, 131 km SW of Guilin, and 148 km E of Hechi. The epicenter of the second aftershock was located 8 km N-NE of the first at a depth of 10 km.
|
Time in origin (GMT) |
Latitude, degree |
Longitude, degree |
Depth, km |
Stations number |
Ms/N |
mb/N |
I0 (calculated) |
GAP |
Center |
|
1
|
13:44:26.2
|
24.48 |
109.21 |
10.0 |
110
|
Mww 5.1/32 |
5.6/211 |
|
20
|
NEIC(2) National Earthquakes Information Center of US Geological Service
|
| 2
|
16:21:07.0
|
24.5 |
109.29 |
10.0 |
40
|
|
5.2/32 |
5.5-6 |
183
|
GS RAS(Verified [1]) Federal research center, Geophysical survey of Russian Academy of Sciences
|
|
3
|
16:21:05.9
|
24.52 |
109.29 |
10.0 |
15
|
|
5.3/15 |
6-6.5 |
|
GS RAS(Preliminary [1]) Federal research center, Geophysical survey of Russian Academy of Sciences
|
|
4
|
16:21:05.1
|
24.45 |
109.26 |
0.0 |
218
|
Mw 5.1 |
5.3/112 |
|
21
|
CSEM(1) European - Mediterranean seismological center
|
|
5
|
16:21:06.4
|
24.46 |
109.2 |
10.0 |
53
|
Mww 5.0/16 |
5.1/80 |
|
54
|
NEIC(1) National Earthquakes Information Center of US Geological Service
|
| 6
|
13:44:27.0
|
24.56 |
109.33 |
10.0 |
49
|
|
5.6/46 |
6.5-7 |
80
|
GS RAS(Verified [2]) Federal research center, Geophysical survey of Russian Academy of Sciences
|
|
7
|
13:44:27.0
|
24.72 |
109.29 |
10.0 |
21
|
|
5.6/21 |
6.5-7 |
|
GS RAS(Preliminary [2]) Federal research center, Geophysical survey of Russian Academy of Sciences
|
|
8
|
13:44:26.7
|
24.54 |
109.23 |
10.0 |
441
|
Mw 5.1 |
5.6/208 |
|
20
|
CSEM(2) European - Mediterranean seismological center
|
Fig. 1 presents fragments of records obtained from digital stations Chiang Mai (∆ 11.2º), Ulaanbaatar (∆ 23.4º), Zakamensk (∆ 26.3º), Ussuriysk (∆ 27º), Orlik (∆ 28.9º) for the first earthquake. Fig. 2 presents fragments of records obtained from digital stations Chiang Mai (∆ 11.2º), Ulaanbaatar (∆ 23.3º), Zakamensk (∆ 26.2º), Ussuriysk (∆ 26.9º), Orlik (∆ 28.9º) for the second earthquake.
Image 1
Image 2
Focal mechanism solution of the origin was calculated at the GS RAS with signs of initial arrivals of P waves at 50 stations, including 35 stations which registered compression waves (plus signs), and 15 stations which registered tensile waves (minus signs). The stations are located in the interval of epicentral distances 5-65º and in azimuth sector Az=2-359º. Focal mechanism solution in stereographic projection on the lower hemisphere and elements of the mechanism are presented in the table. The table also contains focal mechanism solutions obtained at the USGS NEIC with WW-phase Moment Tensor (Mww) technique and in German Research Centre for Geosciences GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ). Solutions from different centers are close. The earthquake occurred under prevailing action of compression stresses oriented S-SE (AZ=149-153º) according to GS RAS and GFZ and SE (AZ=142º) according to USGS NEIC. One nodal plane NP1 strikes W-SW (STK=243-248º) according to GS RAS and USGS NEIC and SW (AZ=234º) according to GFZ, another plane NP2 strikes E-NE (AZ=58-63º) according to GS RAS and GFZ and NE (STK=45º) according to USGS NEIC. According to GS RAS the planes are dipping at the same angle (DP=45º). According to USGS NEIC and GFZ one plane NP1 is more horizontal (DP=22-34º) if compared with another NP2 (DP=57-69º). The type of motion along both planes – reverse fault according to GS RAS and USGS NEIC, while according to GFZ the type of motion along NP1 – thrust and along NP2 – reverse fault. Seismic moment according to USGS NEIC makes Mo=4.268*10**16 N*m, Mww=5.0. According to GFZ it makes Mo=5.995*10**16 N*m, Mw=5.1.
Focal mechanism solution of the second earthquake was calculated at the GS RAS with signs of initial arrivals of P waves at 77 stations, including 63 stations which registered compression waves (plus signs), and 14 stations which registered tensile waves (minus signs). The stations are located in the interval of epicentral distances 5-96º and in azimuth sector Az=5-359º. Focal mechanism solution in stereographic projection on the lower hemisphere and elements of the mechanism are presented in the table. The table also contains focal mechanism solutions obtained at the USGS NEIC with WW-phase Moment Tensor (Mww) technique and in German Research Centre for Geosciences GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ). Solutions from different centers are close. The earthquake occurred under prevailing action of compression stresses oriented S-SE (AZ=148º). One nodal plane NP1 strikes SW (AZ=234-236º), another plane NP2 strikes E-NE (STK=59-62º). NP1 is more horizontal (DP=21-38º) if compared with NP2 (DP=52-69º). The type of motion along both planes - reverse fault according to GS RAS and USGS NEIC, along NP1 – thrust, along NP2 – reverse fault according to GFZ. Seismic moment according to USGS NEIC makes Mo=5.482*10**16 N*m, Mww=5.1. In GFZ solution it makes Mo=8.250*10**16 N*m, Mw=5.2.
| Axes of main strengths |
Nodal planes |
Center |
|
| T |
P |
N |
NP1 |
NP2 |
PI: 85
Azm: 245
|
PI: 0
Azm: 153
|
PI: 5
Azm: 63
|
Stk: 248
Dp: 45
Slip: 97
|
Stk: 58
Dp: 45
Slip: 83
|
GS RAS (1) Federal research center, Geophysical survey of Russian Academy of Sciences (1)
|
|
PI: 76
Azm: 286
|
PI: 12
Azm: 142
|
PI: 8
Azm: 51
|
Stk: 243
Dp: 34
Slip: 105
|
Stk: 45
Dp: 57
Slip: 80
|
NEIC (1) National Earthquakes Information Center of US Geological Service
|
|
PI: 66
Azm: 339
|
PI: 23
Azm: 149
|
PI: 3
Azm: 241
|
Stk: 234
Dp: 22
Slip: 81
|
Stk: 63
Dp: 69
Slip: 93
|
GFZ (1) German Research Center for Geosciences
|
|
PI: 74
Azm: 356
|
PI: 13
Azm: 139
|
PI: 9
Azm: 231
|
Stk: 217
Dp: 33
Slip: 73
|
Stk: 57
Dp: 59
Slip: 101
|
GS RAS (2) Federal research center, Geophysical survey of Russian Academy of Sciences (2)
|
|
PI: 82
Azm: 359
|
PI: 7
Azm: 148
|
PI: 4
Azm: 239
|
Stk: 234
Dp: 38
Slip: 83
|
Stk: 62
Dp: 52
Slip: 95
|
NEIC (2) National Earthquakes Information Center of US Geological Service
|
|
PI: 66
Azm: 330
|
PI: 24
Azm: 148
|
PI: 1
Azm: 238
|
Stk: 236
Dp: 21
Slip: 88
|
Stk: 59
Dp: 69
Slip: 91
|
GFZ (2) German Research Center for Geosciences
|
|